Changed files reviewed
What the buyer gets back.
This is a public sample of the written AgentProof Mini Audit deliverable: scoped intake, evidence summary, risk signals, first fixes, and the stop rule for one public PR. It is generated from public metadata only.
Sample only. Real customer reports use the buyer's public repo, demo, or PR and stay async. No private repo access, payment data, credentials, production access, or calls.
Diff size captured
Maintainer objection
Failed checks
Executive Summary
Verdict: do not push harder. The PR is already closed, no review approval is recorded, and the maintainer objected to the testing approach and to fully AI-generated PRs. The useful next move is a materially better proof packet or a different target.
Risk Signals
- PR is closed, so this is a post-outcome proof/readiness review, not an active merge push.
- Maintainer language shows an explicit review objection; do not keep pushing without better proof.
- No formal review approvals are recorded.
Checks
| Check | Status | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|
| CI / test | Completed | Success |
Files Changed
| Path | Additions | Deletions |
|---|---|---|
Sources/DarkMode.swift | 2 | 1 |
Tests/Tests.swift | 19 | 13 |
dark-mode.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj | 2 | 2 |
What To Verify Before Asking For Review
- Prove the failing or controversial behavior with a reproducible command, fixture, or screenshot.
- Explain why the implementation approach is correct for the project, not just why CI passes.
- Remove generated churn, irrelevant files, and broad edits that make review expensive.
- If a maintainer explicitly says the route is not welcome, stop pushing and choose another target.
Generated By
npm run service:fulfill -- --issue <public-pr-intake> --payment-verified scripts/build-pr-proof-pack.mjs npm run service:delivery-draft -- --report <customer-report> --buyer-email <buyer>